The trash
haulers lawsuit that originated in 2008 has worked its way all the way up to
the Missouri Supreme Court where the trash haulers won in 2013. The case
was remanded back to the Circuit Court to settle the only remaining issue,
which is just how much the county will have to pay the three victorious haulers
(American Eagle, Meridian and Waste
Management). The county appealed the money judgment and thinks that it can also appeal the merits of the original case again. However, Jane Dueker, the winning attorney for the trash haulers says that “the (Missouri) Supreme Court has determined that they (the county) did not give the proper notice, then in fact the only issue left is how much money they owe the trash haulers for wrongfully displacing them.”
Charlie
Dooley
Garry
Earls
Patricia Redington
Charlie Dooley |
Management). The county appealed the money judgment and thinks that it can also appeal the merits of the original case again. However, Jane Dueker, the winning attorney for the trash haulers says that “the (Missouri) Supreme Court has determined that they (the county) did not give the proper notice, then in fact the only issue left is how much money they owe the trash haulers for wrongfully displacing them.”
When Elliott
Davis asked St. Louis County Counselor Pat Redington why the county did not
send the notice certified mail as required by state statute before taking away
the trash haulers customers, she replied, “They all got it. There’s no
question that they got it.” And, she added, “The only question is whether
a letter telling the trash haulers about the program should have been sent by
certified mail instead of regular mail.”
Dueker
countered by stating that the whole issue could have been easily avoided if the
county would have just complied with the law. Dueker said, “Very
easily. They could have just given the notice. It would have been
real easy to just comply with the law. They (the county) just said, oh,
we don’t have to.” I mean, that’s what they’ve always said, they’ve had
that level of arrogance that they don’t have to comply with the law.”
With regard
to the pending judgment, Redington says that the taxpayers would only have to
absorb $2 million dollars of the $5.9 million dollars judgment, since insurance
would cover the rest. However, the county’s insurance rates could be
affected, especially since this issue could have been avoided by complying with
the law.
Of the trash
hauler’s judgment, Dueker said, “We initially got a judgment for $1.1
million. The county appealed. And, now that judgment is $5.9
million. And, interest is running on that judgment currently. We’re
currently requesting about $8 million dollars. And, so if the county
appeals again, yes, that number could go up.”
When asked
about the handling of the case, Redington told Davis that she thought the
county handled the case properly. She said, “I think we did the case
right. I’m happy with the way we did the case.” And, of course, why
wouldn’t she and the rest of the Dooley administration be happy. After
all, they can’t be held personally accountable and it’s not their money at
stake – it’s yours, the taxpayers.
If you would
like to express your opinion about this issue to your St. Louis County
officials who played a key role in establishing a trash program that will cost
you millions, call or email the following officials, as they’re probably
anxiously awaiting to hear from you.
St. Louis County
Executive
Chief Operating Officer
St. Louis County Counselor
(314) 615-7016
(314)
615-7016
(314) 615-7025
Click on the
following link to watch the two minute and 42 second “You Paid For It”
video about the county administration’s bungling of the never-ending trash
fiasco:
No comments:
Post a Comment