Showing posts with label subdivision. Show all posts
Showing posts with label subdivision. Show all posts

Monday, August 18, 2008

Countywide Subdivision Trustee Network Meeting Set for Thursday, Sept. 11

The next quarterly meeting of the county wide Subdivision Trustee Network Group is set for Thursday, September 11 at 7:00 p.m. to 8:45 p.m. at the Weber Road Library, 4444 Weber Rd., Affton, MO 63123 (314) 638-2210.
.
Mr. Andrew Meyerkord with St. Louis County will be our guest speaker. He will discuss the County’s new website for subdivision trustees and related services available from the County.

You're invited to participate. The purpose is to provide for an exchange of ideas and information to benefit trustees in handling the routine business of their respective subdivisions.

This site is not limited just to trustees but all residents of St. Louis County. Got a question? Send it in. We'll publish it and do our best to get you an answer. You can search the entire database on key words such as "County Council", "Trash", "subdivision" and dozens of others. Add your comments to any article of interest.

If you need more information, you can contact us at: subtrustees@swbell.net. We hope to see you on September 11.

Monday, June 09, 2008

Subdivision In Need of Help

We received the following e-mail asking for some help and advice. This situation may not be as unusual as one may think as many builders often start a subdivision and do not end up finishing it. What are your thoughts about this situation? Drop us a note at: subtrustees@swbell.net and we will publish and forward your suggestions. Or you can click on COMMENTS below to post your thoughts. Thanks.

=============

I own a home in a subdivision where the builder has gone out of business, not bankrupt just closed the doors, with 9 homes occupied out of 44 lots. We do not have a homeowners association at this time as the builder still had control.

The builder also built villas in a development next to our subdivision under a different name where we share amenities such as a pool, part of this development is still active. At this point we are looking for advice as to whether we should be trying to form an association?

Under our covenants there is a successor clause where the builder can transfer the rights to another builder or whoever owns the vacant lots. At this point we do not know who owns the vacant lots, the bank or if the builder has retained title under a different name, but they now need to be mowed. Accurate information is hard to come by so if you have any suggestions as to where we can find answers let me know.

The homeowners all in our subdivision all want to protect our investment but we need advice as to what we should be doing.

Sunday, March 02, 2008

Some Subdivisions That Opted Out of Trash Programs Say They Can’t Loose

At least one subdivision in South County and one in North County recently negotiated trash hauling prices with their hauler at prices that may be hard to beat. Both subdivisions opted out of the County’s trash program to allow their residents to select their own hauler. The cost for the basic once-a-week trash pickup ranged from $12 for one subdivision to $15 for the other. (Note: they also have charges for recycling, yard waste and fuel/environment)

In both instances, the hauler agreed to match the price of the County’s selected hauler thus making this a win-win situation for both residents and hauler. It appears the subdivisions have negated the County’s mandate that the County select their trash company. Hello!

The good news is the residents will have a recycling program at their front door and rates that are guaranteed to be equal to or lower than the County’s.

The bad news is 1) they have to pay for recycling whether they use it or not; 2) they will have a third truck coming into their subdivision (one for trash, one for yard waste and one for recyclables); 3) taxpayers are paying for a trash program that does not benefit ALL residents of the county.

Haulers agree the unrest among county citizens would be put to rest if residents had the choice of selecting their own trash haulers. The way to accomplish this is to do away with trash districts and let the market and competition determine the rates.
.
.

Saturday, February 16, 2008

"NEW" - Subdivisions Moving to Opt-Out

As of January 25, more than 200 subdivisions choose to opt-out of the County's trash program. If your subdivision is "opting-out," please let us know and share your action with other subdivisions. Also, if your subdivision is "opting-in," send us a note. Since the February 1 "deadline" has passed, we may be discontinuing this list. If we can get a list of all 200+, we will publish this.

Subdivisions opting out (2/15/08):

Arbor Oaks, (192 homes) West County
Chalet Forest Subdivision (148 homes) South County
Chestnut Park, (351 homes) South County
Concordia Village Subdivision, (48 homes) Southwest County
Country Village Hills II, (108 homes) North County
Fontainbleau Estates, (18 homes) North County
Fox Woods, (206 homes) North County
Golden Gables (87 homes) South County
Green Valley Estates, (95 homes) South County
Hathaway Manor South (1,062) North County
Hawks View Estates (142 Homes) South County
Herman's Orchard (67 Homes) North County
Lake of The Woods Addition (67 homes) South County
Lake of the Wood Subdivision, (392 homes), South County
Mission Park East Plat 3, (142 homes) North County
Oakbriar Meadows Addition, (74) South County
Paddock Forest (434 homes & 270 condos) North County
Paddock Forest Addition No. 5, (75 homes) North County
River Walk at Bee Tree Park Subdivision (64 homes), South County
Royal Hills (106 homes) South County
Silver Leaves Subdivision, (36 homes) Southwest County
Silver Springs Plantation, (36 homes) South County
Tealridge Improvement Assoc. ,(120 homes)
Timber HillsTowne South (715 homes) South County

Village at Paddock Lake (73 homes) North County
Wood Glen Subdivision (7) South County
Wynfield Estates (124 homes) South County

.





Don't forget to Log Off

Saturday, November 17, 2007

Survey Says . . . .

Would your subdivision residents have a problem with this home in your subdivision? We've seen homes decorated with plastic trees, palm trees in sand, numerous torch lights, art work and more. While you may say you have no objection, how would you feel if you lived next door to this house?

We just concluded a "quickie" survey on this subject and 81% said "Yes", that their subdivision residents would have a problem with this house.

5% said residents would not have a problem and 14% felt it was OK citing "freedom of speech."

The bottom line here is "society" determines what is acceptable and that is done by making rules, regulations and laws. If someone wants something that is quite eratic, they should build their home in the "eratic" subdivision down the road. Let's face it, unusual, oddball and eratic houses reduce the value of surrounding homes.

What are your thoughts? Click on COMMENT below and share your thoughts.

Thursday, November 15, 2007

County’s Trash Procedures Open New Questions; Confusion Reigns

St. Louis County Officials presented implementation plans to more than 360 residents on November 8 at Oakville Senior High School plus another 250 residents at Mehlville Senior High School that same evening.

They also presented implementation plans to about 175 people attending their meeting at Affton High School on November 14. Sheryl Hodges moderated the Oakville and Affton programs and answered written questions submitted by the audience. Attendees were not permitted to speak or ask questions.

County officials have posted the finalized trash-district plans on the county's Web site at http://www.co.st-louis.mo.us/ but the information available is very limited. Answers to many questions remain unpublished. A change in the implementation date has been proposed for the county's new minimum standards of once-per-week pickup of trash and recyclables and twice-per-year pickup of bulk waste. Dates recommended are for enforcement on April 15 instead of January 1.

We continue to note conflicting information from County officials, local newspapers and answers presented at these meetings.

For example, the following was published in a local newspaper as a result of the meetings of November 8.

“ Any subdivision that wishes to opt out of the trash districts, each of which will be serviced by one trash hauler chosen by the County Council, has until Feb. 1 to petition the county.”

This issue was specifically addressed at the November 14 meeting at the Affton High School. Sheryl Hodges stated that a subdivision who opted-out may be served by multiple trash haulers provided they meet the County’s minimum standards. And that these haulers will be selected by the subdivision trustees, and not the County. Hello!!!

Subdivision Associations have between now and February 1, 2008 to opt out . . . . but unfortunately, they do not know what they are opting out from. Will the county program trash fees be $10 per month or $50? A subdivision association would be foolish not to opt out to put the odds on their side. They can always opt back in should the fees be lower.

We also heard from attendees from the March 8 meetings that an individual homeowner may opt-out of the trash program. This is in direct conflict of statements made at the November 14 meeting. At the present time, an individual homeowner or family CANNOT opt-out. Only a subdivision governed by trust indentures or other types of restrictions may choose to opt-out.

Legislation introduced by Councilman John Campisi proposes to allow individual homeowners to opt-out. This will be voted on by the County Council at their meeting next Monday, November 19. Note, the Council’s meeting has been changed from Tuesday, November 20 to Monday, November 19.

One key question asked was who is paying for the receptacle carts for recycling? Answers ranged from a grant from the federal government to St. Louis County to fees collected by the trash haulers. Now we hear officials are gathering bids and that they will deliver 65-gallon receptacle carts to unincorporated residents starting in January 2008 – but the program is now slated to start as of September 1, 2008. We still don't know who will really be paying for the carts. Whoops. It will probably be us, the consumer taxpayer.

If a receptacle costs $50 and the County needs over 100,000, that calculates out to around five million dollars - $5,000,000. But as county officials move forward with plans to implement trash districts to adhere to the new minimum standards, both north and south county residents have protested the move because of a provision that will strip them of the right to choose their own waste hauler

Who will invoice residents for the hauling services? This is another question where conflicting answers flourished. Information provided at the Affton HS meeting has the individual trash haulers billing residents.

Another key item was enforcement of the program should a homeowner refuse to pay or use the service. Enforcement and penalty provisions are in the legislation which calls for penalties, fees, liens, legal action and even jail. St. Louis County will prosecute.

If you generate trash, you will be charge regardless if you use the service or not.

When questioned about the $400,000 item budgeted for 2008 to cover start-up costs of the program, Mrs. Hodges said this “expense” will not be incurred as personnel are being transferred from other county departments to provide the necessary labor. This raised the question as to what other county services will be affected. Hello, do we really need these people in the first place?

The number one question remains as “What will the trash program cost?” Sorry, but this won’t be answered until late spring or summer 2008. Isn’t this a little backward? What happens if the costs are 50% or more higher than present? Does anyone think county residents will not care?

The County will be looking to the trash haulers to help “police” and identify residents that are not using the service in their district or not complying with County regulations.

Attention Trustees: If a subdivision opts-out of the program, subdivision trustees may be required to monitor the performance of their chosen hauler to make certain the hauler meets county standards. In other words, do they offer the specified services? Are they properly insured? Who handles service complaints? Who does all this work? Subdivision assessment fees will be going up.

How do trustees and residents feel about the trash progra? Click here for a copy of a survey recently completed asking some hard questions:
http://www.mydocsonline.com/pub/wrogers/TrashSurveyResultsFinal11-04-07.pdf

Questions? Contact the St. Louis County Solid Waste Districting Program at:

Neighborhood Services Manager
Attn: Solid Waste Districting Program
St. Louis County Public Works Dept. 6th Fl.
121 S. Meramec Ave.
Clayton, MO 63105

Tel: 314-615-4285
Fax: 314-615-8906 or 314-615-8411
Attention: Solid Waste Districting Program



Website: http://www.stlouisco.com/

Comments welcome. Click below and speak up.
.

Saturday, September 15, 2007

Easy Solution to County Trash Pick-up Proposal

County officials propose to divide unincorporated areas of St. Louis County into eight to 10 waste-hauling districts and assign one trash hauler to each district. All one- and two-family homes would be guaranteed a minimum level of trash service, including recycling, once-a-week pickup and twice-yearly bulk pickups.

Many country residents are up in arms against the proposal. Excluding the excessive number of trash hauling trucks in many subdivisions, they are satisfied with the current levels of service.

Most feel costs will rise substantially. Many south county residents surveyed now pay $10-$12 per month for a weekly pick-up. Projected costs being discussed are upwards to $20 per month, an increase of over 80%.

One South County subdivision has 87 homes of which 53 use a common carrier. The remaining 34 use three other carriers, thus four different companies are in the subdivision twice a week.

Here’s a very simple solution – not only for this subdivision – but for all others in unincorporated areas.

1. St. Louis County should require all subdivision associations to register with the County.

a. This will help to identity just how many groups and trustees are in the county. Right now, it’s questionable if the county even knows.

2. The County should pass a requirement that all registered subdivisions use a common carrier and specify the levels of service.

a. This allows local subdivision residents to select their own carrier.

b. Current trash rates would apply.

c. Residents not complying would be subject to current subdivision and/or county penalties.

d. Subdivisions could continue to negotiate with their carrier for competitive rates and may include or exclude the trash fees from their annual assessment.

3. For St. Louis County residents who are not a part of a subdivision, the county can assign a trash carrier to provide their service.

A three-point plan. Pretty simple. Cut and dry. What are we missing here?

Tuesday, July 24, 2007

Neighborhood bans sex offenders from living there

BRANSON, Mo. -- State law says sex offenders can't live within 1,000 feet of a school or a child care center. Now members of a neighborhood are trying to keep sex offenders away. People who live in the Pointe Royale subdivision say their rule provides peace of mind for homeowners, renters and guests.