Oral
arguments were heard at the Missouri Supreme Court on May 10, 2012.
In
its 35 page decision , the seven member court ruled en banc in favor
of the trash haulers by stating that St. Louis County failed to provide the
trash haulers a two-year notice prior to the implementation of a trash districting
program, as required by state statute. The court also ruled that the
haulers were entitled to monetary damages and remanded the case back to the
circuit court for a hearing to determine the amount of damages that are due
each hauler. The court further held that St. Louis County must pay the
haulers net profits for two years after the date the county entered into
contracts with its “designated” haulers in each of the eight trash districts.
The
victorious trash haulers were represented by Jane Dueker, while the
unsuccessful St. Louis County was represented by seasoned county counselor,
Patricia Redington.
While the high court’s decision was applauded by the successful trash haulers, it was devastating news for those St. Louis County officials who violated Missouri state law, thus placing county taxpayers on the hook for damages, which are estimated to exceed $23 million. As a point of reference, last year, St. Louis County Circuit Judge Barbara Wallace awarded damages of $799,593 to Waste Management, $261,086 to American Eagle and $99,224 to Meridian, for a total of $1,159,903. One doesn’t need to be a mathematician to determine that there is a big difference between $1.16 million versus $23 million.
After four years and four major lawsuits later,
it appears that the final chapter is about to be written on St. Louis County’s
controversial trash districting program, which will culminate in the St. Louis
County Circuit Court of Judge Barbara Wallace. The original lawsuit was
also filed in the circuit court, but was initially won by St. Louis
County. The trash haulers subsequently appealed to the Missouri Court of
Appeals for the Eastern District and were successful. County counselor
Redington then moved the case to federal court in the U.S. District Court for
the Eastern District of Missouri. However, that court remanded the case
back to the state circuit court where the county was once again the
loser. As one can readily surmise, the county counselor has attempted
about every possible legal maneuver to get a “win” for the county in the state
and federal judicial system, much like a game of ping pong. But, now,
after four years of spending taxpayer money fighting a monopolistic trash
districting program and violating state law, St. Louis County finds itself up
against a wall with no more options for appeal and no way out, much like a
suspect surrounded by a S.W.A.T. team.
Even though the haulers will receive just
compensation for lost business after being cut out of the county’s trash
program, the infamous program will continue to operate as a near monopoly,
consisting of only two trash haulers (Allied and IESI) for the entire
county. However, those 300+ subdivisions that wisely “opted out” of the
county’s program will forever be free to choose their own hauler(s), while
those subdivisions and/or areas that did not or could not “opt-out” of the
county program, will forever be forced to use the county’s “designated”
haulers. The foregoing is the bone of contention about the whole program,
as this fiasco could have been avoided had the county sought a vote of its
residents on this controversial issue.
After 95+ e-mail communications since 2007 from this
committee and Subdivision Trustees – St. Louis Metro Area, there will be at
least one more communication concerning the final outcome of Judge Wallace’s
ruling. Hopefully, that communication will put the contentious issue of
“trash” in St. Louis County to rest for good. But, as the famous New York
Yankee catcher, Yogi Berra always said, "It Ain't
Over 'til It's Over."
The
complete news story from the St. Louis Post-Dispatch is posted below for your
convenience. In addition, the link to the audio interview between Mark
Reardon of KMOX Radio and St. Louis County Council member Steve Stenger (6th
District, South County) is as follows:
The
interview runs 4 minutes and 36 seconds. In that interview, councilman
Stenger firmly places the accountability for the infamous trash districting
program on the shoulders of County Executive Charlie Dooley.
Isn't this program a huge saving for county taxpayers just as we were promised it would be?
ReplyDeleteNo - the rates are actually higher. The new company is run by friends of Dooley.
ReplyDeleteYeah, it sure is a "huge" savings. There is very little difference between the prices of the county's haulers vs. the prices of the haulers for the subdivisions that opted-out. Just wait until there is only one county hauler and the prices start going up. Then, you will realize what the word "monopoly" means. Remember Charter Cable?
ReplyDeleteThe best part is that even those of us that live in municipalities and "opt out" subdivisions get to pay for this too!
ReplyDelete