Showing posts with label Lester Stuckmeyer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lester Stuckmeyer. Show all posts

Saturday, April 11, 2009

County Trash Dispute Far From Over; Check Fox 2 for Report

There is some major trash talk happening in St. Louis County. The controversy surrounding the county's trash districting program is far from over. Attorneys and residents in St. Louis County say the County Charter says they have the right to put the trash program to a public vote.

A circuit court judge delayed a decision on Thursday (4/9/09) for at least another 45 days.

The Hasslers of Oakville say they're tired of being hassled by their trash hauler. They are only one of thousands across St. Louis County.

Click here for Fox 2 video.

http://www.fox2now.com/ktvi-trash-contraversy-stlouis-county-040909,0,6158390.story

According to St. Louis County's new trash program, the Hasslers have to pay their designated hauler even if they don't use it's services."

They wouldn't like it if I sent out bills to people that I didn't do the work," said Jess Hassler.

Attorney Lester Stuckmeyer Jr. said, "The county closed the loophole. That forces everyone to go to the county hauler and the hauler is obligated to report those people saying they are not having their trash picked up." Stuckmeyer is fighting for residents rights. He's trying to get the trash program put to a public vote."

The charter says that if the county makes a trash district and charges for it then they are required to get a vote and the county didn't do that so we are asking that the court declare this program void," said Stuckmeyer.

Residents like the Hasslers are now seeing citations."This says we have 10 days to pay $100," said Madonna Hassler.

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "County Trash Dispute Far From Over; Check Fox 2 fo...":

The residents and voters in St. Louis County have no representation. I would encourage all residents and voters to seek annexation by a neighboring community, or form your own. St.Louis County is not longer needed, because municipal government is more effecient and closer to the people.Eleminate St. Louis County.

Friday, September 05, 2008

Lawsuit Making Its Way Through the Legal System

Two residents and a waste hauler filed a lawsuit the end of August against St. Louis County that seeks voter approval of eight trash districts established in unincorporated areas. They say the trash districts were improperly established because they were not approved by the voters of each district as required by the County Charter.

American Eagle Waste Industries along with south county resident, Brett Buchanan, and north county resident, Greg Porter, filed suit Aug. 22 in St. Louis County Circuit Court. They allege in the suit that the county "has directly violated the command of its own governing charter by imposing upon its citizens in unincorporated areas a mandatory trash-district program and service charge without an authorizing vote by the citizens in each district, as required by the charter.”

(Attorney Lester Stuckmeyer addresses reporters. From left, are: Bryan Barcom of American Eagle Waste, Greg Porter of north county and Brett Buchanan of south county. Click on Photo to enlarge)

County officials have denied claims that trash districts must be created by a vote of the people in each district. Attorney Lester Stuckmeyer along with fellow attorney Robert Schultz, now is representing American Eagle, Buchanan and Porter in their suit against the county.

The county has established eight trash districts in unincorporated areas with one trash hauler per district. While one district already has been implemented in north-central St. Louis County, the seven remaining districts will take effect Oct. 1 in unincorporated areas. A total of 311 subdivisions — or 26.92 percent of total households in unincorporated areas — petitioned the county to opt out of trash districts.

County officials contend that having one hauler per district will result in a more uniform brand of service and lower prices.

Some waste haulers and residents have criticized the move because county officials also have stated that districts likely would force some small haulers out of business due to a lack of competition.

American Eagle owner Bryan Barcom estimates that his company will lose "60 to 65 percent" of more than 22,000 households under contract in St. Louis County when the seven remaining trash districts are effective. He believes this will result in a $3 million annual loss for his company. With these factors in mind, Barcom said he entered into this lawsuit "to save our business and to ensure that our employees have a place of employment."

American Eagle joined with two other waste haulers to file a previous lawsuit this year against the county, but the Missouri Supreme Court rejected those haulers' request for a writ of mandamus. This came after American Eagle, Meridian Waste Services and Waste Management of Missouri appealed a June 25 dismissal from Circuit Court Judge Steven H. Goldman.

The Eastern District of the Missouri Court of Appeals on June 27 also denied a request for a writ of mandamus submitted by the waste haulers.

Stuckmeyer contends that the County Charter requires voters in each proposed district to vote on their establishment. "If you look to the county and what their defense was on the first lawsuit, it was: 'No, no, no, the state statute doesn't apply to me. We're a charter county. We're a charter government. Our charter is the rule,'" Stuckmeyer said.

"Well, we're saying: 'Here's your charter.' It clearly states that if you create trash districts and in those trash districts you pay for them with a service charge, i.e. you have to pay the charge for the service, that each of these districts are required to have a vote ... So the county can't have it both ways."

When asked if the ultimate goal behind the lawsuit is to get citizens in each proposed district to vote on them, Stuckmeyer said, "That would be great. If tomorrow the county government said: 'OK, we'll put it to a vote,' I would accept whatever outcome came out of that vote. If the people in the districts voted and said they wanted it, everybody would be fine ... It's hard to accept that you're being forced to do something without having a say in it."

Until the county puts trash districting to a vote, Stuckmeyer maintains that the county is not only unresponsive, but "afraid of its own citizens."

"What does it hurt to give them the right to vote?" Stuckmeyer said. "What are they afraid of? They're afraid of stinging defeat in the face of opposition that they know is there. Look to the opt-outs just to tell you. They're afraid of the people. County government is afraid of its own citizens."

An online survey found 1 in 4 people regularly retreats to a spare room or sofa to get a good night's sleep.

Friday, June 13, 2008

Did County Violate Its Own Charter? Legislators Says "Yes"

Opponents of the St. Louis County trash hauling districts say the county violated its own charter by setting up the controversial trash plan without putting it to a vote of the public.

Councilman John Campisi, R-south St. Louis County, said a section of the charter deals with creation of special districts in unincorporated county areas, including those for garbage and refuse collection. The provision provides for creating districts "as the voters therein by a majority of those voting ... may approve."

Campisi called for the resignation of County Counselor Patricia Redington for failing to alert the council of that charter section before the trash districts were established. The county has divided its unincorporated areas into eight trash collection districts. "This should have been brought to our attention way before the signing of legislation back in 2006 ... and it wasn't," Campisi said in a news conference Thursday morning.

Charlie A. Dooley, County Executive, said the charter provision doesn't apply to the trash districts. The section, he said, applies to districts in which taxes are being levied. "We are not talking about raising taxes," said Dooley, adding that winning bids for the new trash collection program will result in cost savings to many residents. Dooley spokesman Mac Scott said the trash districts were set up under health provisions of the county charter. Many have said they were not aware that St. Louis County had a "health" problem.

Redington could not be reached for comment. But Dooley said she is "very well-versed" on the charter.

Supporters say that will cut down on multiple trash trucks driving through subdivisions on different days. But others say it eliminates competition and state representative Jim Lembke says it may violate the county's charter.

"It is my hope that they will reverse this, these illegal actions. But I want to make something crystal clear. If they do not do what's right on behalf of their constituents and the people of the county, then we will bring suit. Okay? And we will take them to court and sue," Lembke said.

Lester C. Stuckmeyer Jr., an attorney who has represented citizen groups opposed to the trash hauling plan, said the Dooley administration "has no power to create the monopoly district program under the charter without the approval of citizens in each district." Stuckmeyer said the approval must come before the districts are established and the trash hauling contracts are awarded.

Last month, three trash haulers sued the county over creation of the districts. The haulers, who have been providing service in the county, said they had not been given enough notification on the change.

Thursday, December 20, 2007

Comments Worth Repeating

The following comments are included in "Comments Worth Repeating" published in the right hand column.


"This clumsy, monopoly trash-district plan is not the will of the people. It hasn't arose from the people saying 'This is what we want.' It is a political power play to create monopoly franchises for favorite insiders."
. . . Rep. Jim Lembke (R) Lemay

~~~~~

"Here's the part that really stinks. The county attorney, after the judge issued her decision, signed a secret agreement not to appeal the court's decision in exchange for Fred Weber to dismiss their counterclaims. This agreement was signed without any notice to the County Council - her own clients - and without any notice to the people."
. . . Lester Stuckmeyer, Attorney

~~~~~

The 2009 budget "will be very difficult to produce. We do not forecast a substantial increase in revenue. We will very carefully execute next year's budget."
. . . Garry Earls, the county's chief operating officer